Elk parturition site selection at local and landscape scales
(Book)

Book Cover
Average Rating
Published
Washington [etc.] : Wildlife Society, 2011.
Physical Description
pages 646-654 : charts ; 28 cm.
Status

Summary

Loading Description...

Also in this Series

Checking series information...

Copies

LocationCall NumberNoteStatus
Yellowstone Research Library - Pamphlet or Vertical File CollectionMAMM-ARTIO-CERV-ELK(BARBKNECHT 2)Digital version available upon requestOn Shelf

More Like This

Loading more titles like this title...

More Details

Published
Washington [etc.] : Wildlife Society, 2011.
Format
Book
Language
English

Notes

General Note
Printout of journal article.
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references.
Summary
Selection of habitat components by ungulates associated with parturition sites varies among and within species depending upon vulnerability to predators, variation in local topography and climate regines, and the length of time that the maternal-neonatal unit spends at or near the parturition location. We marked 169 parturition locations of elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) in western Wyoming using vaginal implant transmitters and evaluated parturition-specific habitat selection at macro- and microhabitat scales using a resource selection function modeling approach. Elk calved in a variety of habitats, yet demonstrated selection at both spatial scales. We found the strongest support for models that incorporated multiple habitat features and focused on topographical and vegetative cover types that provide physical and thermal cover at the macro-habitat scale and for visual cover models at the microhabitat scale. Models based solely on forage availability or quality were least supported at both scales, which may be indicative of a brief occupation of the parturition location or low heterogeneity in the availability of forage resources on parturition ranges. Results of early elk natural history studies may have represented a bias introduced by variable sightability and accessibility of females with calves and a lack of differentiation between calving and neonatal periods. More clearly defining calving site selection and removing biases toward more open habitats where sightability of neonates is greater may be used by wildlife or land manageers to improve or protect calving habitats, which is often a stated objective of management actions. The results of this study suggest that microhabitat is more important to elk and that temporal closures over broad areas versus closures focused on specific macrohabitats may be more effective in protecting calving animals.

Citations

APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)

Barbknecht, A. E., Fairbanks, W. S., Rogerson, J. D., Maichak, E. J., Scurlock, B. M., & Meadows, L. L. (2011). Elk parturition site selection at local and landscape scales . Wildlife Society.

Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Andrea Ellen. Barbknecht et al.. 2011. Elk Parturition Site Selection At Local and Landscape Scales. Wildlife Society.

Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Andrea Ellen. Barbknecht et al.. Elk Parturition Site Selection At Local and Landscape Scales Wildlife Society, 2011.

MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)

Barbknecht, Andrea Ellen., et al. Elk Parturition Site Selection At Local and Landscape Scales Wildlife Society, 2011.

Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.